Wednesday, April 4, 2007

State Guidelines for Exploring SSA

Today’s City Paper article about MPASS and the proposed SSA policy mentioned the Tennessee State Board of Education’s guidelines for districts considering a school uniform policy. Though not a legally binding document, the guidelines represent the right approach to this issue according to educational policy experts. Ironically, while the SSA Committee selectively quoted this document as part of its “study” process, it ignored many of the guidelines—specifically, those on parental involvement, opt-outs, and when to use voluntary, rather than mandatory, approaches (see Points 1, 4, 5, 7, and 8).

Tuesday, April 3, 2007

Minority Report from the SSA Committee

The student representative to the school board's Standard School Attire (SSA) Committee has issued a report documenting the committee's blatant rejection and misrepresentation of research findings on SSA. Read the report here.

Monday, April 2, 2007

Press Release to Media 4-2-07

April 2, 2007 (Nashville, TN)—A parents’ group opposed to uniforms in Metro public schools is charging that the study process which led to a proposal before the school board was hopelessly biased. With the school board slated to vote on a Standard School Attire (SSA) policy in just eight days, the group MPASS (Metro Parents Against Standard School Attire) is raising questions about the methods used by the committee appointed to examine the issue.

The MNPS “study” committee examining SSA was co-chaired by pro-uniform principal Tonya Hutchinson, whose school, Isaac Litton Middle School, instituted uniforms this year but has not yet evaluated their success. The committee included five other pro-uniform principals, and—toward the end of the process, at the insistence of Nashville’s Parents’ Advisory Council—two parent representatives.

Along with a student representative, the parents appointed to the committee attempted to persuade the group to look seriously at arguments on the other side of the issue, but met with little success. The principals on the committee were “so passionately in favor of implementing an SSA policy that they were guided by that desire, rather than any dispassionate exploration of the evidence,” said Mark Schoenfield, one of the committee’s parent members. “What was meant to be fact finding morphed into propaganda when they realized that no solid evidence supported a district-wide implementation.”

MPASS is charging that the SSA Committee ignored the facts and misrepresented published research evidence that clearly shows there is no scientific correlation between school uniforms and improvement in discipline, safety, or academic achievement. In the committee’s March 27 report to the school board, evidence was contorted or simply ignored so that the desired result could be achieved.

Until this report was presented to the school board on March 27, the vast majority of Metro parents had no reason to expect that the process would be so biased and flawed. Most parents have been kept in the dark about the research evidence on school uniforms.

The SSA Committee’s effort to gauge parent opinion on the subject of school uniforms was also unacceptably biased. In the school board’s unscientific telephone “survey” last month, parents who participated were not informed that current policy already allows individual schools to choose SSA on a school-by-school basis.

The “discussion” portion of the SSA decision process also seems to be missing. Is it sound policy making to present a plainly biased report at one school board meeting for the first time, and then schedule a board vote on it at the next meeting, with no time allotted for discussion of that report? An issue so important to the lives of MNPS students and parents should involve those most affected, especially when the officials appointed by the school board to fairly examine the issue have clearly not done their job. Tennessee Department of Education guidelines require parental involvement from the beginning of the process. Parents who have objected to the implementation of a district-wide policy have repeatedly been ignored by the school board—just like the evidence.

MPASS is urging school board members to vote against the proposed policy because it is both unjustified on the merits and the product of a tainted “study” process. MPASS encourages school board members to inform their constituents about the existing school-by-school uniform policy that can be used to explore whether standard school attire works in Nashville’s school communities. Equally important, MPASS reminds our education leaders that scientific evidence should not be disregarded when such a far-reaching policy is being considered.

Friday, March 30, 2007

Five Things You Can Do Right Now

1. Email, write, or call school board members (not just for your district, but all of them):

Here are some points you can make in your letter.

To learn more about members of Nashville’s Metropolitan Board of Public Education, visit the Board Member page of the MNPS website.

2. Email or write a letter to the editor:

Here are some points you can make in your letter.

3. Attend the school board meeting April 10 at 5 p.m., 2601 Bransford Ave. These meetings are open to the public, and your presence is essential to make your views heard!

4. Speak at the school board meeting April 10. Signing up is easy. See how here.

5. Contact other parents and ask them to do the same.

Talking Points

Key points to make when writing a letter about the proposed standard school attire (SSA) policy:

  • Standard school attire should remain a school-based decision. This is already the current policy.
  • Research does not support any connection between school uniforms and improved discipline or safety.
  • The board’s study process has not been objective or impartial.
  • There are more effective ways to address these issues, such as teaching conflict resolution skills.
  • There’s increasing evidence that the Nashville community does not want this.
More details on each of these coming soon!